BCNN1 - black news, christian news
Front Page   Search BCNN1   Make BCNN1 Your Homepage   Refresh this Page   About   Contact   Links   Advertise   Privacy Policy   Sitemap
Christian News Black News National News World News Business News Financial News Health News Entertainment News Sports News Technology News Books Eye on Africa Opinion BCNN1 Home Page

2012 Movie Review

| 26 Comments | No TrackBacks

 
2012-movie.jpg
Roland Emmerich or Michael Bay: Who is Hollywood's true reigning King of Schlock?

 

In the mid-1990s, Emmerich threw down the gauntlet with the planetary disaster-action spectacle Independence Day, in its day a ranking contender for most the staggeringly overproduced B-movie to date. Two years later, Bay arguably upped the ante with the similarly overproduced planetary disaster-action spectacle Armageddon.

Emmerich's next film was the Revolutionary War cartoon The Patriot, followed a year later by Bay's WWII cartoon Pearl Harbor. After that, both Emmerich and Bay took stabs at dystopian near futures with The Day After Tomorrow and The Island, respectively.

Bay's latest salvo is Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, an over-the-top, overwrought, over-long, would-be apotheosis of every disaster movie and action flick ever made. But Emmerich is not to be outdone: 2012 is his over-the-top, overwrought, over-long would-be apotheosis of every disaster movie and action flick ever made.

11-13film2012jpg-70f2b241778a385d_large.jpg
By this point in their careers, a few things are clear. Emmerich has a dimmer vision of the future than Bay; his movies offer real apocalypses, while even Bay's Armageddon is about an apocalypse averted. But Bay has a dimmer outlook on mankind. Emmerich seasons his schlock with schmaltz, with cornball speeches about decency, loyalty, family and humanity. Bay likes his trash trashy, with generous dollops of gratuitous sleaze and exploitation.

In Bay's movies, women are sex objects--pinups and playmates if not bimbos, strippers and/or prostitutes--while men are cocky, testosterone-charged studs or else wish they were, by gum. Men and women in Emmerich's movies are no less cartoony, but the women are wives, ex-wives and daughters, while the men struggle with doing right by them.

A typical Emmerich hero earnestly worries about things like the appropriateness of burning the works of Nietzsche for heat in a post-apocalyptic world. If a typical Bay hero is earnestly concerned about anything, it's probably Megan Fox's midriff. Emmerich might be more likely to kill off nine-tenths of the world's population, but Bay is less likely to make you feel like it would matter. Not that you're very likely to care, or care a lot, in an Emmerich film. But at least you feel that Emmerich cares--and that he wants us to care--and that's better than nothing.

24.jpg
2012 is Emmerich at his most existential--and his most laughable. I don't mean only the premise, which blends silly technobabble about solar flares and neutrinos with a few actual science facts (like the volcanic hotspot under Yellowstone) and a concatenation of New Age anxieties around the year 2012 supposedly connected to the ancient Mayan calendar, in roughly the same way that the Heaven's Gate cult's anxieties around the Hale-Bopp comet were "connected" to the Bible.

Nor do I mean the jaw-dropping set pieces, which go way beyond conventional action-movie impossibilities like outrunning fireballs. In two of the movie's best scenes, the heroes race through a disintegrating landscape, literally riding the event horizon of a rolling cataclysm consuming the earth directly under their vehicles' wheels. Crumbling buildings, tumbling vehicles and heaving shelves of rock and earth extend the crisis into four dimensions. Whether action movies should aspire to the condition of theme-park rides is highly debatable, but they do, and the set pieces in 2012 set a new standard for what is possible in this respect.

But then, whenever there is a lull, the characters start talking--and, at crucial moments, they even make speeches ... and that's when 2012 goes beyond ludicrous into bathos. Perhaps the funniest thing in the film--it actually becomes a running gag of sorts, though not necessarily an intentional one--is the way that Chiwetel Ejiofor's earnest scientist keeps harking back to hero John Cusack's obscure sci-fi writer, oblivious to Cusack's parallel storyline but still citing him as some sort of touchstone of what really matters. Okay, maybe it doesn't sound funny when I say it like that, but trust me, it gets funnier every time.

If 2012 is an apotheosis of all disaster movies, that means it's also an apotheosis of all disaster-movie clichés. Ejiofor is the scientist who knows what's going on and has to persuade someone in power to listen (see Jeff Goldblum in ID4, etc.). Danny Glover is the noble African-American president who has to decide when to go public with the facts (see Morgan Freeman in Deep Impact).

john_cusack_history.jpg
Hero Cusack (why bother with character names?) has an ex-wife (Amanda Peet), who's now with a more responsible guy (Thomas McCarthy), and occasionally shares custody of their two kids, a younger girl and an older boy who is disaffected and resentful toward his father (see Spielberg's War of the Worlds).

Stepdad McCarthy is not a bad guy, but he's an L.A. plastic surgeon, so that's one strike. On the plus side, he wants kids and goes grocery shopping with the wife. "I feel like something is pulling us apart," he tells Peet one day at the supermarket, seconds before the floor splits beneath their feet and the entire store is ripped in half, with Peet on one side and McCarthy on the other. Obviously, God believes that Peet belongs with the father of her children.

The other moment in which two figures are strikingly separated by a sudden split in a crumbling edifice occurs in Rome, where a crack runs the length of the Sistine Chapel ceiling--directly between the adjacent fingers of God and Adam. Outside, a crowd of thousands keep vigil in St. Peter's Square, holding candles, while the pope looks down from his balcony and a knot of cardinals prays within the basilica, until St. Peter's goes the way of all landmarks in a Roland Emmerich film. (It's been a rough year at the movies for St. Peter's; first the antimatter bomb in Angels & Demons, now this.)

Well, most landmarks, anyway. At the urging of Emmerich's co-writer Harald Kloser, who warned Emmerich that he ran the risk of a fatwa, the Kaaba in Mecca, Islam's most sacred site, isn't destroyed onscreen. Rio de Janeiro's colossal Christ the Redeemer statue: not so lucky. Because, you know, Christians don't do fatwas. (The movie does take a verbal poke at the Taliban militia who demolished the ancient Buddha statues in central Afghanistan.)

Is all of this meant to add up to some sort of religious outlook or statement? Well, perhaps not. Even so, by the climactic act, believers may be thinking of a biblical promise that seems to be pretty decisively broken. There's also a final subtitled dateline that seems to put the whole Christian era in a relative context, as if the Christian calendar as well as the Mayan calendar has run its course.

2012-movie (1).jpg
Then there's the scene in which the president, as an ecumenical prayer on behalf of the world, starts to recite Psalm 23--but the transmission cuts out before he can even finish the first line. What, Ejiofor gets to quote one line after another of Cusack's crappy fiction, but Glover can't get off one lousy Bible verse at the end of the world? Here is a melancholy thought: How many people in the audience won't even know how "The Lord is my shep ... " ends, or where it's from?

One more thought on religious implications (spoiler alert): While we see a Tibetan monk is among the survivors (you didn't think Emmerich was going to kill everyone, did you?), the only Christian clergy shown are the Catholic prelates who die at St. Peter's. This is a problem for me as a Catholic. I can deal with the destruction of the Vatican; it's only real estate. Muslims might or might not feel their faith offended or threatened by the destruction of their holiest sites, but Christianity doesn't work that way.

On the other hand, if Emmerich is going to specifically show the Vatican leadership going down with St. Peter's, I want to see Catholic (and/or Orthodox) bishops among the survivors--somewhere on the planet. The Church must continue, and while a Protestant with a Bible may be good to carry things on, Catholics need the succession of bishops. 2012 doesn't say that there aren't bishops among the survivors, but if Emmerich can kill 'em onscreen, he could have let some live onscreen.

SOURCE: Christianity Today - Steven D. Greydanus
Comments | RSS  | 
| More

 

Try Angie's List!

Related Posts with Thumbnails

26 Comments

Please help us to monitor our comments by reporting abusive, spam, offensive, illegal, racist or libelous posts to bcnn1(at)bcnn1.com.

if every editor wrote like you believe me the world would be a better place! this was an excellent read expecting more!

Hoeveel kan ik lenen? (hypotheek). Wat worden mijn maandlasten? (hypotheek) ... Hoeveel hypotheek heb ik nodig? Hoe hoog is de boete die ik nu zou moeten

Hoeveel kan ik lenen? (hypotheek). Wat worden mijn maandlasten? (hypotheek) ... Hoeveel hypotheek heb ik nodig? Hoe hoog is de boete die ik nu zou moeten

Hoeveel kan ik lenen? (hypotheek). Wat worden mijn maandlasten? (hypotheek) ... Hoeveel hypotheek heb ik nodig? Hoe hoog is de boete die ik nu zou moeten

While it’s always nice to order for new Best Replica Handbags to find just the right can be difficult. Never a good idea, just a bag on the platform of the store and think it will be the finishing touch to all your carefully planned ensembles, you’re wrong itself. Wearing an elegant and expensive Gucci bag is not in itself sufficient to bind and give their teams, the elegant look you seek.

Damn, awesome website. I actually came across this on Ask Jeeves, and I am happy I did. I will definately be revisiting here more often. Wish I could add to the post and bring a bit more to the table, but am just taking in as much info as I can at the moment.

Thank You

watch movies.net

Realization of the dreams of many, is the best of fashion from the runway at his feet, a collection of Christian Louboutin shoes and Evening Handbags . There are almost a nation of women who love Christian Louboutin shoes. And the natives of that country to decide by the second, more women for the growing national of that wonderful brand for mobile professionals and the increase of women from all walks of life.

The French fashion house Hermes High specializing in a variety of Discount Replica Handbags including clothing, ready-to-wear, leather goods, accessories and fragrances. The Fashion House Hermes has been making in Paris in a harness shop in 1837 by Thierry Hermes (1801-1878) founded.

Great blog. I acquired lots of great data. We?ve already been keeping an eye on fraxel treatments for some time. This?s fascinating the way it retains shifting, yet a few of the core elements stay the same.

I’d be inclined to admit with you on this. Which is not something I usually do! I really like reading a post that will make people think. Also, thanks for allowing me to speak my mind!

Whenever I come to your blog now, the text looks really small. Did you change something with your design? I can't read the type when it's like this. Please advise, I don't want to miss your great posts! Thanks.

Good info and straight to the point. I am not sure if this is truly the best place to ask but do you guys have any thoughts on where to employ some professional writers? Thanks :)

You made a number of fine points there. I did a search on the subject and found mainly folks will go along with with your blog.

You completed several fine points there. I did a search on the theme and found mainly persons will consent with your blog.

Great idea this, see you then. Are there any forums that you recommend I join ?

Well I sincerely enjoyed reading it. This information procured by you is very constructive for proper planning.

Well I definitely enjoyed reading it. This article offered by you is very helpful for proper planning.

Could you message me with a few tips on how you made this blog look like this, I'd be appreciative!

Have you considered adding some differing opinions to your article? I think it might enhance viewers' understanding.

Thanks for posting this. Was looking for this info all over the web.

I appreciate the time you put into this post. In fact your writing has inspired me to kickoff my own blog now. Thanks again for taking the time to put this up.

Would you like to post a guest post on my blog?

Nice information, many thanks to the author. It is incomprehensible to me now, but in general, the usefulness and significance is overwhelming. Thanks again and good luck!

Hey, what theme are you using? Looks very professional.

Its crazy how much more attention I get from the opposite gender now that I smoke cigars!

I can see that you are an expert at your field! I am starting a website soon, and your information will be very useful for me.. Thanks for all your help and wishing you all the success in your business.

Leave a comment

Weekly Bible verses and Christian quotes

 

Christian Cash Assistance

 

Black news of interest in the Christian community

The BCNN1 advertisement policy

Connect with BCNN1

BCNN1 on Facebook BCNN1 on Twitter Get the BCNN1 RSS Feed Del.icio.us Add BCNN1 to your Google home page StumbleUpon Add BCNN1 to your Yahoo home page Technorati

Need Prayer?

Christian News

On Being Saved in Black America What to do after you enter through the door BCNN1/BCBC National Bestsellers List BCNN1/BCBC National Bestsellers List Black Christian Book Promo Videos What to do to go to Hell Job Search World Time MSNBC Morning Joe Meet the Press CNN CBS News Nightly News The Today Show NBC Fox News ABC News TV One