With David Petraeus' career suddenly at an end, some journalists are wondering whether the former CIA chief was really deserving of the veneration he received from many in the media.
|Do You Like this Article? Then Like Us on Facebook.|
The news that Petraeus was stepping down after having an affair was greeted with an almost grief-stricken tone by many in the press. Andrea Mitchell, who broke the story, described it as a "very painful" one to have to tell her viewers.
Wired reporter Spencer Ackerman wrote a long mea culpa on Sunday titled "How I Was Drawn Into The Cult Of David Petraeus."
"Like many in the press, nearly every national politician, and lots of members of Petraeus' brain trust over the years, I played a role in the creation of the legend around David Petraeus," he wrote.
Ackerman recounted how Petraeus and his staff had charmed him with access and attention, and how he began questioning himself if he wrote something negative about the general. He added that, though he'd never written anything he didn't think he could back up, he had given Petraeus a pass too many times.
"That's not something you should fault Petraeus for," he wrote. "It's something you should fault reporters like me for. Another irony that Petraeus' downfall reveals is that some of us who egotistically thought our coverage of Petraeus and counterinsurgency was so sophisticated were perpetuating myths without fully realizing it."
Click here to read more.
SOURCE: The Huffington Post