Chicago recently shut down 50 of its schools in the largest single wave of public school closures in history. So why is the city now trying to open more charter schools?
Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel speaks about legislation and policies to reduce and prevent gun violence during a policy discussion at the Center for American Progress in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 14, 2013. Emanuel was a senior adviser to former U.S. President Bill Clinton during the passage of the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban. (Photo credit: SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images)
Chicago Public Schools on Monday quietly posted a 52-page document asking charter schools to apply to operate in the city starting in the 2014-2015 and 2015-2016 school years. The document says the district wants charters to open in 11 neighborhoods that have overcrowded schools, although it does not indicate how many charter schools the district would need.
The Chicago Board of Education voted to close 50 of the city's public schools in May after charging that some city schools were being "underutilized" and should consolidate to save resources. In the wake of these closings, critics panned the idea of opening new charter schools.
District spokesperson Keiana Barrett told the Chicago Sun-Times that underutilization is an entirely separate issue from overcrowding.
Public school advocates have long charged that the closing of public schools -- and the call for more charter schools -- is part of elaborate scheme to privatize education. While charter schools are funded by public money, they are operated by private organizations and are usually not unionized.
"We are not surprised at all by this," said Chicago Teachers Union President Karen Lewis to Chicago public radio outlet WBEZ. "We were called conspiracy theorists, and then here is the absolute proof of what the intentions are. ... The district has clearly made a decision that they want to push privatization of our public schools."
Wendy Katten, an activist who is against school closures, told the Sun-Times that some of the so-called "priority neighborhoods" highlighted by the district as potential charter locations already have schools that the district previously debated closing, although they ultimately remained open.
"Some of these priority areas had schools originally on the closing list," said Katten. She cited the Chicago area of Pilsen as an example and went on to say, "I agree with consulting stakeholders and taxpayers on what kind of schools they want in their community, something this administration has no interest in doing."
Source: Huffington Post | Rebecca Klein